What Happens to TSLA After a Big Earnings-Day Gap: 10-Year Base Rates
Why Gap Base Rates Matter
A TSLA earnings-day gap greater than 3% is not a rare event — it has happened 34 times since 2016. That's enough to compute base rates on rather than argue from a single prior print. The question isn't 'did TSLA gap' (it did), but 'when TSLA has historically gapped like this, what has the following week done?'
Gap Hold vs Fade Base Rates
Across the 34 historical TSLA earnings-day gaps greater than 3% (both directions), the 5-day follow-through split roughly evenly: 18 of 34 held the gap direction, 16 of 34 faded. That's essentially a coin flip. But the split is NOT random — it correlates with two specific features:
- Pre-earnings drift: when TSLA rallied into the print, the gap tended to fade (supply from momentum exits). When TSLA drifted into the print, the gap tended to hold.
- VIX level on the gap day: gaps at VIX < 20 held more often (11 of 14) than gaps at VIX 20-30 (5 of 12) or VIX > 30 (2 of 8).
- Volume relative to 20-day average: gaps on 3x+ average volume held more often than gaps on 1.5-2x volume (stronger commitment).
Using the Base Rates
Base rates are a prior, not a signal. The useful thing to do with a 53% historical hold rate is to check whether today's setup matches the 'hold' cluster (pre-earnings drift + low VIX + high relative volume) or the 'fade' cluster. Chart Library's pattern search does that matching automatically — it doesn't just return TSLA's own history, it returns analog setups across 19,000+ symbols that shared the pre-event conditions.
The result is a conditional base rate rather than an unconditional one. Conditional base rates tend to be more useful for agents because they reflect the specific regime the stock is in, not just a pooled long-run average.
TSLA's full gap-history table and its current analog set are live at chartlibrary.io — grab an API key at /developers if you want programmatic access.
Ready to try Chart Library?
Anchor any ticker + date — see what history says about your setup, with cohort statistics, feature attribution, and AI narrative.
Try it freeLearn the methodology
Chart Library is built on four canonical concepts. Read the pillars to understand what backs the numbers in this post:
Related Articles
MCD Q1 2026 Earnings: What 12 Years of Reaction Cohorts Say
McDonald's reports Q1 2026 before the open on May 7. Pulled the cohort of MCD earnings analogs back to 2014 — comp-store-sales beat vs. miss is the single feature that flips the 5-day forward distribution from positive to negative.
DDOG Q1 2026 Earnings: The Observability Cohort Going In
Datadog reports Q1 2026 before the open May 7. The cohort of DDOG and adjacent observability/devtools earnings prints shows that net-revenue-retention is the single feature that separates +6% follow-throughs from -8% fades.
CELH Pre-Earnings: A High-Vol Cohort With A Distinct Reaction Pattern
Celsius Holdings reports Q1 2026 before the open May 7. The cohort of CELH earnings prints — and adjacent high-growth beverage analogs — has a distinct two-mode reaction distribution driven by Pepsi-channel commentary.